Rocketry Center Forums

Full Version: Anybody got a working definition of Oddroc?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Are Goonys Oddrocs?  or does it take something like a flying lawn chair to be considered one?

Translation:  What constitutes an Oddroc?
You certainly will get a lot of opinions here.  I know 'em when I see 'em Smile

I hold a wide definition which includes saucers, pyramids, spools, monocopters, bicopters, goonies, themed rockets like goonies but of different scale, repurposed items, etc.   What I don't count is what I considered 'junk rockets' made from found materials but which still resemble a 3/4FNC. Toilet paper tubes, an Easter egg cone and regular fins don't count. Sci-fi themed rockets in general don't count. But R2D2 and Yoda would.
This post reminds me of what Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said about "porn".

"I cant define an Odd Rock but I know one when I see One"
(06-16-2015, 01:00 PM)K Wrote: [ -> ]Translation:  What constitutes an Oddroc?

Be aware.

18 (1.58 threads per day | 18.18 percent of total threads)

Thread propagation scrolls off more interesting content from the new posts screen. It is one of the things that made TRF hard to cope with.
I would have said that Goonies do qualify as Oddrocs... but not all Oddrocs are Goonies.

My understanding is that a Goonie starts with a Baby Bertha and then designs out from there.
Oddrocs on the other hand are specifically NOT traditional "nosecone, body tube, fins" rockets.

But I could be wrong. What say you?
We used to have a contest event with actual rules.  The rocket that looks least like a rocket but flies wins.  Typical entries were toilets (scaled down), battleships, Phisohex bottles from retail displays, styrofoam hats, whatever.

A Gooneybird would definitely not qualify..

Just Jerry
Yeah, if I saw a goonie version of a real world missile or famous Estes kit, I'd say no. If it looks like an animal or a Martian, then I probably would say yes.

Warning: My definition of an odd-roc is subject to change without notice.
(06-22-2015, 10:09 PM)Kirk G Wrote: [ -> ]I would have said that Goonies do qualify as Oddrocs... but not all Oddrocs are Goonies.

My understanding is that a Goonie starts with a Baby Bertha and then designs out from there.
Oddrocs on the other hand are specifically NOT traditional "nosecone, body tube, fins" rockets.

But I could be wrong. What say you?

I think the Goonies predate Baby Bertha.  I'd have to hit the Estes Archive to verify
Yes, the original Estes Goonybirds were from about 1973. I believe they had 13 mm motor mounts, and used a slightly different length BT-60 than the Baby Bertha, which came out about 2002 and from which most scratch goonies are kitbashed.
(06-18-2015, 09:29 AM)Rocketman Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-16-2015, 01:00 PM)K Wrote: [ -> ]Translation:  What constitutes an Oddroc?

Be aware.

18 (1.58 threads per day | 18.18 percent of total threads)

Thread propagation scrolls off more interesting content from the new posts screen. It is one of the things that made TRF hard to cope with.

He likes to post a lot.  No need to be a dick.
Pages: 1 2